Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:51:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:51:36 -0500 Received: from dsl-64-192-216-221.telocity.com ([64.192.216.221]:13060 "EHLO topgun.unixexchange.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:51:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:49:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Carl D. Speare" X-X-Sender: To: David Weinehall cc: Quim K Holland , Subject: Re: need to suggest a good FS: In-Reply-To: <20010223183423.N5465@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, David Weinehall wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:34:23 +0100 > From: David Weinehall > To: Carl D. Speare > Cc: Quim K Holland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: need to suggest a good FS: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:20:34PM -0500, Carl D. Speare wrote: > > Actually there isn't. Hmmm, sounds like I'll have some hacking to do... > > > > But I have to ask if this is something that would actually be desirable. > > Given how rare it is, does the Linux community actually want to have YAFS > > (yet another file system) added to the list, especially for an even more > > rare OS like OpenServer 5.0.x? Maybe now that Caldera is involved more > > with SCO, it might be something that happens in a few months anyway... > > Make a read-only version; this will make transition from HTFS to > {ext2fs, reiserfs, xfs, jfs, ...} easy. Read-only also has the property > that it won't cause on-disk corruption; at worst, you get in-memory > corruption... > > > /David > _ _ > // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ > // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // > \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/