Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751634AbcJBQls (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 2 Oct 2016 12:41:48 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:35234 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750927AbcJBQlr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 2 Oct 2016 12:41:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161002160917.GA22039@kroah.com>
References: <20160930214912.GA6932@gmail.com> <20161002152355.GB32091@kroah.com>
 <CANQNnfGy50kygxezO3WEt+zHh5EH5RRgvKkJA0OFU7BFPMn5KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161002153937.GA21118@kroah.com> <CANQNnfEn886+2NKjJ5NzZc-QGb-T4AX2y+a1+bWzNw5ecdCDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161002160917.GA22039@kroah.com>
From: Nadim Almas <nadim.902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 22:11:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CANQNnfHSTJp6E0-4xN+pw4SZLyNiGokKeY+zRPVEDAfaW0afjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Staging:dgnc:dgnc_neo: fixed 80 character line limit
 coding style issue
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, markh@compro.ne,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 507
Lines: 14

So my first patch is correct?

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 09:13:32PM +0530, Nadim Almas wrote:
>> sir i am  new in linux kernel hacking so I just want to start with
>> something very simple ,so for sake of simplicity and learning I fixed
>> only one of these warning
>
> That's great, but next time try to do a little bit more, just fixing a
> single warning like that isn't all that useful overall, right?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h