Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <02054675-8395-ac81-6863-e3a5cbfc9032@users.sourceforge.net>
 <f56845a8-03c6-d3f7-6091-99dba9835780@users.sourceforge.net>
 <e918e655-cd86-c3c8-d911-9dfc03b03e19@de.ibm.com>
 <7da823eb-939c-9ee6-32bf-db296e6a96f6@users.sourceforge.net>
 <44fd46f6-441a-d497-9157-7e2a0f3f45da@de.ibm.com>
 <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
 <a1642c2a-c013-2dec-29fb-1748a52e1c24@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAJSP0QV_V-aEvdE76PnOH6TNJPJCuf+6N7SkySDAnrhbNNhv3w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
        Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <e9c595e9-b27f-5c8f-6862-88e5856ab916@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:00:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QV_V-aEvdE76PnOH6TNJPJCuf+6N7SkySDAnrhbNNhv3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1049
Lines: 41

>> I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it?
> 
> I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.

Thanks for another feedback.


> Your communication style is exhausting

How did you get this impression?


> and you've pushed into the territory where any benefits of taking

Would you dare to acknowledge benefits from my update suggestions
for any other software components?


> the patches are not worth the time and hassle of dealing with you.

How are the chances that such a conclusion will change?


> I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.

Thanks for your constructive responses.


> Maybe they will get picked up.

I am also curious on how the software evolution will be continued.


> But please think again about what Christian explained.  Reviewers and
> maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.

I risk something just by proposing so many software updates for places
where change opportunities were found by special source code search patterns.

Regards,
Markus