Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754168AbcJEH35 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 03:29:57 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38204 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230AbcJEH34 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 03:29:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:29:48 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Message-ID: <20161005072948.h72gu5mw4p3fxa7q@linutronix.de> References: <20161003091234.879763059@infradead.org> <20161003091847.624139932@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161003091847.624139932@infradead.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 347 Lines: 10 On 2016-10-03 11:12:37 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > These are unused and clutter up the code. it seems that it has been like that since day one (Ingo's patches from 2006 [0] are like that). I assume we never had real code behind this functions, right? Not even in -RT? [0] http://people.redhat.com/mingo/PI-futex-patches/patches/ Sebastian