Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754978AbcJEVOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:14:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:42668 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753296AbcJEVOh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:14:37 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org C1FE46179E Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=timur@codeaurora.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Timur Tabi Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:14:33 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: How to test CONFIG_MODVERSIONS? To: linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 443 Lines: 10 Can someone give me an example of a situation where a kernel built CONFIG_MODVERSIONS would allow a driver to load, but the same kernel built without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS would reject that driver? I'm trying to see if there's value in enabling CONFIG_MODVERSIONS for our internal kernels. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.