Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:59:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:58:51 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:42468 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:58:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:06:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030327.080627.71980411.davem@redhat.com> To: shmulik.hen@intel.com Cc: bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bonding-announce@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [Bonding][patch] Adding Transmit load balancing mode to bonding From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 13 From: shmulik.hen@intel.com Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:38:02 +0200 (IST) Balancing is connection oriented (e.g. by IPv4 destination address) so packet order is always kept. You could also key off of the destination/source port as well for UDP/TCP/SCTP. Have you experimented with this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/