Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755568AbcJFJul (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2016 05:50:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47205 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S941904AbcJFIid (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2016 04:38:33 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Mat Martineau , Willem de Bruijn , Marcel Holtmann Subject: [PATCH 4.7 058/141] Bluetooth: split sk_filter in l2cap_sock_recv_cb Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:28:14 +0200 Message-Id: <20161006074451.277267770@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.0 In-Reply-To: <20161006074448.608056610@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20161006074448.608056610@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3854 Lines: 109 4.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Daniel Borkmann commit dbb50887c8f619fc5c3489783ebc3122bc134a31 upstream. During an audit for sk_filter(), we found that rx_busy_skb handling in l2cap_sock_recv_cb() and l2cap_sock_recvmsg() looks not quite as intended. The assumption from commit e328140fdacb ("Bluetooth: Use event-driven approach for handling ERTM receive buffer") is that errors returned from sock_queue_rcv_skb() are due to receive buffer shortage. However, nothing should prevent doing a setsockopt() with SO_ATTACH_FILTER on the socket, that could drop some of the incoming skbs when handled in sock_queue_rcv_skb(). In that case sock_queue_rcv_skb() will return with -EPERM, propagated from sk_filter() and if in L2CAP_MODE_ERTM mode, wrong assumption was that we failed due to receive buffer being full. From that point onwards, due to the to-be-dropped skb being held in rx_busy_skb, we cannot make any forward progress as rx_busy_skb is never cleared from l2cap_sock_recvmsg(), due to the filter drop verdict over and over coming from sk_filter(). Meanwhile, in l2cap_sock_recv_cb() all new incoming skbs are being dropped due to rx_busy_skb being occupied. Instead, just use __sock_queue_rcv_skb() where an error really tells that there's a receive buffer issue. Split the sk_filter() and enable it for non-segmented modes at queuing time since at this point in time the skb has already been through the ERTM state machine and it has been acked, so dropping is not allowed. Instead, for ERTM and streaming mode, call sk_filter() in l2cap_data_rcv() so the packet can be dropped before the state machine sees it. Fixes: e328140fdacb ("Bluetooth: Use event-driven approach for handling ERTM receive buffer") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 8 ++++++++ net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -5835,6 +5836,9 @@ static int l2cap_reassemble_sdu(struct l if (chan->sdu) break; + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, L2CAP_SDULEN_SIZE)) + break; + chan->sdu_len = get_unaligned_le16(skb->data); skb_pull(skb, L2CAP_SDULEN_SIZE); @@ -6610,6 +6614,10 @@ static int l2cap_data_rcv(struct l2cap_c goto drop; } + if ((chan->mode == L2CAP_MODE_ERTM || + chan->mode == L2CAP_MODE_STREAMING) && sk_filter(chan->data, skb)) + goto drop; + if (!control->sframe) { int err; --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c @@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static int l2cap_sock_recvmsg(struct soc goto done; if (pi->rx_busy_skb) { - if (!sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, pi->rx_busy_skb)) + if (!__sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, pi->rx_busy_skb)) pi->rx_busy_skb = NULL; else goto done; @@ -1270,7 +1270,17 @@ static int l2cap_sock_recv_cb(struct l2c goto done; } - err = sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb); + if (chan->mode != L2CAP_MODE_ERTM && + chan->mode != L2CAP_MODE_STREAMING) { + /* Even if no filter is attached, we could potentially + * get errors from security modules, etc. + */ + err = sk_filter(sk, skb); + if (err) + goto done; + } + + err = __sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb); /* For ERTM, handle one skb that doesn't fit into the recv * buffer. This is important to do because the data frames