To: Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: scripts/coccicheck: Update for a comment?
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <ea62a1ea-c566-65a0-e2fd-2ee96839cf48@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 07:47:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 578
Lines: 12

Hello,

Information from a commit like "docs: sphinxify coccinelle.txt and add it
to dev-tools" caught also my software development attention.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/coccinelle.txt?id=4b9033a33494ec9154d63e706e9e47f7eb3fd59e

Did an other information from a comment become outdated in the script "coccicheck"
because of such changes for the documentation format?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n4

Regards,
Markus