Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:26:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:26:29 -0500 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:56476 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:26:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm offsets for i386 From: "David S. Miller" To: Brian Gerst Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3E833EDD.9050007@didntduck.org> References: <200303271728.h2RHSDc28540@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <3E833EDD.9050007@didntduck.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1048793857.20907.0.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 27 Mar 2003 11:37:38 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 711 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 10:11, Brian Gerst wrote: > I already caught one bug with this, since someone recently added values > to the feature flags array and didn't fix up the vendor id offset. What > you propose fails with some non-gcc compilers (Intel's compiler for > example, which supports gcc extensions) that don't optimize it away. Too f*ing bad, this kind of debug test already exists in other places of the kernel. -- David S. Miller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/