Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:41:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:41:49 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:18193 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:41:47 -0500 Subject: Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled. From: Robert Love To: "David S. Miller" Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, dane@aiinet.com, shmulik.hen@intel.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bonding-announce@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru In-Reply-To: <20030327.113933.123322481.davem@redhat.com> References: <20030327.111012.23672715.davem@redhat.com> <20030327.113933.123322481.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048794730.775.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 27 Mar 2003 14:52:11 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 21 On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 14:39, David S. Miller wrote: > I hadn't considered this, good idea. I'm trying this out right now. I hope it works. I have a sinking feeling we call it some places that may have interrupts disabled... > Someone should backport the might_sleep() stuff to 2.4.x, it's very > useful. Would be nice, but for the maximum effect we need kernel preemption (which keeps track of atomicity via preempt_count). I doubt we want to go there for 2.4. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/