Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:45:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:45:50 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:29670 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:45:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:53:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030327.115314.121599027.davem@redhat.com> To: rml@tech9.net Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, dane@aiinet.com, shmulik.hen@intel.com, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, bonding-announce@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled. From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1048794730.775.14.camel@localhost> References: <20030327.113933.123322481.davem@redhat.com> <1048794730.775.14.camel@localhost> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 20 From: Robert Love Date: 27 Mar 2003 14:52:11 -0500 On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 14:39, David S. Miller wrote: > I hadn't considered this, good idea. I'm trying this out right now. I hope it works. I have a sinking feeling we call it some places that may have interrupts disabled... Your sinking feeling was warranted. Nearly every hw IRQ implementation invokes irq_exit() with CPU interrupts off :-( That has to be screwing with performance as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/