Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932855AbcJGVRa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:17:30 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:35515 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932146AbcJGVRW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:17:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161007093226.GA2058@katana> References: <20161007093226.GA2058@katana> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:17:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t-LVx9w-B4aiwTHFH8yXBjR2Re8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9 To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 361 Lines: 11 On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > here is the 4.9 pull request from I2C including: Would you mind double-checking my merge. It looked very trivial, but it would be good to have somebody else give that gpio-pca953x.c conflict a look to verify that I didn't screw up the 'id' variable split. Linus