Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 21:52:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
        David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery
Message-ID: <20161008195250.zaixshuwfas4y27c@pd.tnic>
References: <1475894763-64683-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
 <1475894763-64683-5-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
 <CACbG309kJa-6pAB_7K4GaJEPB7Tw0fQxd=_5+oWtZm1kCaAtHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161008205454.GB7672@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20161008205454.GB7672@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 591
Lines: 19

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:54:54PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > I think these #defines are specific to Intel.  I would prefer if we
> > have _INTEL_ somewhere in them.

We don't generally add vendor names to those defines. Even more so if
the 0x0... leaf range is Intel-specific anyway.

> Is adding "Intel" in comment good?

I don't see any need if the leaf has already this heading:

/* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx), word 9 */

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--