Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752313AbcJIS62 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2016 14:58:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com ([209.85.215.65]:34025 "EHLO mail-lf0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752216AbcJIS60 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2016 14:58:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 21:39:33 +0300 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Anand Moon Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kukjin Kim , Javier Martinez Canillas , Linux USB Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] host: ehci-exynos: Convert to use the SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS Message-ID: <20161009183933.GA15270@kozik-lap> References: <1476023655-3232-1-git-send-email-linux.amoon@gmail.com> <20161009163446.GA9672@kozik-lap> <20161009172757.GA11916@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2491 Lines: 72 On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:57:59PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: > hi Krzysztof, > > On 9 October 2016 at 22:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:45:40PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote: > >> Hi Krzysztof, > >> > >> On 9 October 2016 at 22:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote: > >> >> Move the ehci-exynos system PM callbacks within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> >> as to avoid them being build when not used. This also allows us to use the > >> >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which simplifies the code. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon > >> >> --- > >> >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 14 ++++++-------- > >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> index 42e5b66..1899900 100644 > >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c > >> >> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> >> return 0; > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM > >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > > >> > Does not look like an equivalent change. How will it behave in a config > >> > with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > >> > > >> > >> [snip] > >> > >> I just wanted to update suspend and resume callback to use > >> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS > >> as they are define under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP so I update above to avoid > >> compilation warning/error. > > > Apologize: for not understanding your question. > > > First of all you did not answer to my question, so let me rephrase into > > two: > > 1. Is the code equivalent? > > No CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are different options. > But I could not disable CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option with either in exynos_defconfig So the code is not equivalent... > > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n or > # CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set > > > 2. What will be the output with !SUSPEND && !HIBERNATE && PM? > > # > # Power management options > # > # CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set > # CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set > # CONFIG_PM is not set > > When CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION are not set > CONFIG_PM is disabled and so is CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. In my config, the CONFIG_PM was enabled thus the code changes the functionality... Maybe this was intented but I really don't get it from the commit message or from your explanations here. Krzysztof