Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752227AbcJJM3S (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:29:18 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:54611 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172AbcJJM3Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:29:16 -0400 Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf() To: Dan Carpenter References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <9831fce9-d689-89e4-dec8-50cadcd13fdd@users.sourceforge.net> <20161010110050.GA5687@mwanda> Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <526621dc-ce01-77eb-035d-fd884bf31d2c@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:28:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161010110050.GA5687@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kQOLVrJPN8833afDDDadFqfToTmriQdTz/sxsGhY46pHOZP2ebJ WgHVUil9wA3Zn/gZSLGwfBgQeE+A9bIzcW9Z1dFE3F/dQtXoqoIFxEZw4uuPJHsqfqAROwK OxIzslkyx8uR6ZDc8CQnEHP5HOsDexwP7XkvtybUStbm5yu052DOODgFdnMUhsOp7HIwxEx zthG+28ymMEOq0dmBVEgQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XaCfjA/j1gY=:/wY+RNS3S6d0m5G+BoN1/D /zmLmYxMXnVWD9zVPnW8dvnuvsFupg1ZnJBzzSJqcShY+2StABx0I5vG2dGMQh7X5c51gt1by HnOs4DgWNYPAfup2S0Aimi1JKjPspAVFm8J+WlbuJ0lWlH0w1RCMcedc2ca5xotgQXG1B6m7a FbXq+3ZzwDSNV5qvuB+qugwwSytpw1nu2kDb8wSPdsS7KiRHypgMhBGiuTwe98FJTaxDGfycX 8UyG571RApUX0a3kyUqQqec9IgjuYw7ej1O1e3D4eXE+lVUI3NSrSUpENEcCMMpuhWK7VYxhT bt/fsNS5tXEnFbOQanBSK+LwCT/zklpqbYEw148/LbsPzw1aBCUP12cXl2CZkgqD3MiJn0auq T6pa/ex8Ajr5SxIBOkn8o415S+cUqvPRFfSHw6MFaHZTm1L+9IdWlkc4595xSsscug8FSTVtq PNRhezD0AQfGaJMjbClk6522exFQCASaadb4gIJY4YuJAp9So4LnE4Z13iYR3Or8Ews+XzV0+ bgQlRoOIqN5gHwFt3dfBOlkqxSRquiHjDrU7+YM/ke5jHGZqPtSJgBaTR9AN4+pmcT6+ihXES aD0nlkE2byxebBIM0kquvhve/d5btwDTHgG+B8SG49dGaiaHXwECGX3it85KPiRIv7LLa0uW7 isAglqgqaBTqBiNquLehRPdXOJcZCCFjqfWXDlHRAotm/on0exu3OnpGtHxt6G8tkhUTnH3nM RIMZPXFS2x2FoWAlfrMLUlJoA2pRlmMyfA78ChhANwl1SD/DU/CMsWbCXqAqaZ6aZN5I+5ylr hGywRSf Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 804 Lines: 30 > I am ignoring Markus patches It's a pity that you chose such a reaction. > and have told him that he should focus on bug fixes. I find that I suggest to improve something. Could you admit a few times that I found a "bug" you care also about at other source code places? > These patches don't add any value Can it be that you express a lower value for the Linux coding style here than desired as there might be other concerns behind such negative feedback? > and regularly introduce bugs. How do you think about to discuss corresponding facts further? > That said, "sizeof(*ptr)" is sort of official style. When this implementation detail is so official, I wonder then why some software developers can become "special" about the proposed update step like for this module. Regards, Markus