Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752754AbcJJNVu (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 09:21:50 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:62898 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752319AbcJJNUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 09:20:53 -0400 Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf() To: Jes Sorensen References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <9831fce9-d689-89e4-dec8-50cadcd13fdd@users.sourceforge.net> <20161007075345.GB6039@mwanda> <77d68bcd-1ae4-4808-fc0b-6183ae5fb6c4@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Dan Carpenter , Richard Weinberger , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <10ff33b4-44f0-eaea-8549-79a6ba250a2a@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:20:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bLiI2pPGtRe6bkm2vp3tgYLGp0Zh0jgNSLFoRsp/ev7v5DDmmgW VQ9eA5aCr0spEQRG1Ix8OTRoCjIAK8IQE8CWiNUeBUjsRXFL+DBIxssYRrTLW8y9I1zTN8t LLAgIL8gzOPPU1XN/YOiClE7R9o3H2/N5qyfi5HDQILcU0VZBnAK+okeQ6X0vgFoOuhs1ko pbuOSV2ZQ2cBMPLf5QlXg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gxaj4OnnpFg=:4zvFcRFvwvcQQlQsQDJ08Q UkEK9rg7VoCVCJk1sR0JAJXGKn9MlJj3CEdGF5nTp6PDlxYkAFq+hgMcPkVJ6/is9BtlQOkJO /uLfeYGsRG6Vn8qSTTZQfrAMg6iNgITUELjNy1VN2sZiRssVNOfi9xv42/ZN2sPKI8ZSL6Lhw V+4pyJ+Bqzxxwi55zqpyLCUMnq5b/06RsR2u9GuQMbQmdJ/dnUUGwO1dH7FHjDXluc90amgQ0 uaWqjWtvMGmUDYg4WFxCBmrklZAHVhrlO86O16NTwVk1gF9BAqMhoNs+zkoz76LDl/zsUVDiy MgBANBqrVfAyDLj8wSxtD4Y9xOu7bZY78fN5vp5bOUGFx7ATlY2gVx7FPpj/Ye6E+4izXCeUG lnRvWxmLCNgeptbOfESrrYA/OGnConi8MPUQNWSdxrFF4eQTDiSHJ+3eOQIuEhWzMvYeQ9bPC 4X2MlMTkjsWBqN7MgSeMYziFEzyK4m25S3XIvKNiAsovExbl1qTDvbk8s6KsXZzxXWb1X2rWJ CPGHHvTMO9j8g4+7/0cAiHCben9NYlRmblmHapCWTqf+AC+5DcQV4NMXWKw/bVN3u+bp+PYop DfF+JD8ECYff+6lBusRmVWGvDPdDPelw7ZnrU32OiQkNkU3M6ME5JH9QcIP0ZIK161Z4ZCW0l Xk/ktfS8dI4MMIblbeF6vQ0x59ilJK+B6ntML88/1Wb2EsxLOHxu+J/zugDpzhm+YYyNQQem2 pGVmA5TL9SJmrV7nCv9/wxhj9hlnhblG2DwbXL1y8tsvBKfrZ6rl5BHAosHn3Zv0I5XTxL1Xn 2isuP0r Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 688 Lines: 28 >> How do you value compliance with coding styles? > > The Linux Coding Style is not a law, How serious can such guidelines become for software developers? > nor is it at all perfect. I got a similar impression. But are there enough items where a mostly clear guidance is specified? > You clearly misunderstood how Linux development work I got an other impression. > and you are doing a great job wasting everyone's time with this patchset. Would you like to reject any update steps for the affected source files from this patch series? Can it "accidentally" happen that some of them will be really worth also for your precious software development attention? Regards, Markus