Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753216AbcJJOWG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:22:06 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:57681 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753083AbcJJOWC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:22:02 -0400
Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net>
 <9831fce9-d689-89e4-dec8-50cadcd13fdd@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAFLxGvx0Fr-WNvKYACdvNiZwYzHW4ocna9HPH8J_WPSXWc+ngg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161007075345.GB6039@mwanda>
 <77d68bcd-1ae4-4808-fc0b-6183ae5fb6c4@users.sourceforge.net>
 <wrfjzimcbbft.fsf@redhat.com>
 <10ff33b4-44f0-eaea-8549-79a6ba250a2a@users.sourceforge.net>
 <wrfjeg3ob8vp.fsf@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
        linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
        Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
        Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <38308e94-5495-8433-25dc-51d7b1f76948@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:20:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <wrfjeg3ob8vp.fsf@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:X/H2QMJkRllMB0UmKGpiOqLvpCPRLQaTILQBiplzc2J7m0FFb02
 a+5xlAZXqSn6x7FJUqSV6TnjnwTzv2GBMUsKYoSDhBEa1NVkMhEHZPeyQkL9R6Ge6kN12Hw
 qWSWltSpPMDBR/fBPAec2POXjMEH79lORJr02jjN5a8luNVrjcuy+uu7DuKkNqfdlJ9YkXQ
 oNi5HX6WGDMrgmvNQDusQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DLINd7XmSHU=:DvVSSJ6yx3e3gSBLgX+1TI
 EzWK6JHI2aZnzxOTDQ+5tg4sHJZpe5agbSTCm3bicfxzEm+PmWNxwLM9Oa8E3CHmmyGZJ2Cxx
 8KqxMg0RBkR2yrGSagPWxpwj4EHK6aZ01CZrzzrhbpZ7uuQAVfCZCbm9TMRyEUYhky1SomI9Z
 xH7mBtxsfhLx7NxM33Yv3AF32vcCfnVlex0f4Hju8clMHq8o60iE6UVjsazaqUVWEA0Qa6Iy7
 +Zfh1ZUMxxG+QksN8XCibCxY7A/h2uDxhifnJ5SXHW7v0adfelo4VozUMPhALPsy80sOkJM5b
 ru42JH4fXuYwxadlM6Uu7S/JKqCTqXZDLn9a+AfVRHSvBW2lrmDeMvxmRad8KyYP4JUeXgRUn
 p/JAAWjf3i0XRjcyd39CkR/FegKwu5pKUd3zqHzs6K+02Q5ykvuQZKCEuyDL2UCtfZlrd3Vu6
 Qmic4Vj7RMqDsa/N8yGfnSTJ6r6gHrRd54jMQnkY2ENqmD4vk6g5DelJPQ2PZso44pf4LEWpd
 IBfhRJ38TS+/JvOhTiUoFUb3d0kSP6SyQpv4d6wwYFSFRQIF3HiIhK7bbSa7JegUFx2WYmYQz
 ZnL1jfUxHa65PBFdbb/L5+LajTyDS4gctH+okkJifwEu+x/wOKUwLf2YUHBkQIrYvNx8LDyh8
 j5n+WYm9+0rKen+j4hfeZPZPhf/abDxr2QOwiqZ/9uOP+mnjn14VTGRQzGVcQ0463quEkS/9z
 VKHbNYNt2uEkgJwOzIMlZ7k39mQbXmPke1u0iSw6pynveNrYVot9Xz+/2nZU1waJ82EVSXtY0
 nQXp4WS
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 692
Lines: 22

>> Can it "accidentally" happen that some of them will be really worth
>> also for your precious software development attention?
> 
> Given that none of your patches fix any real bugs

Are there any ones which would eventually become "real" also for you?


> and you do your best to ignore any guidance you have been given,

I dare occasionally to find reasons out for a specific disagreement.


> I do reject your entire patchset and you can consider this a NACK for this entire series.

Thanks for your feedback.

I am still curious if any other software developers or source code reviewers
would dare to express an other opinion for one of the shown update possibilities.

Regards,
Markus