Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753603AbcJKS1K (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:27:10 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53]:33067 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753319AbcJKS1I (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:27:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <WM!8ae38b052eee9a42a4712d13aee34e2d793055d4125e98cc2c03451811f33168b3556d3bf52ee5ba8dda879cea808cdc!@dg.advantech.com>
References: <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390AE@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
 <WM!ea1806249edeb2cf70790bb7482fb813b9b7cef636576d9ca4b01897c8831c3650f71356a13ce9ba5e358a69b86f6a82!@dg.advantech.com>
 <CAOMZO5CXTEpNvAhuc2Et60HxfM=nQngMTdMOtDbazi=1EQ95Jw@mail.gmail.com>
 <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A39613@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
 <WM!8b5ef465717800ac4466674b98bb32450dc231d955cd4979ca96fd54828a7c3af7de5f376015ebf046c75f20677161c6!@dgg.advantech.com>
 <WM!8ae38b052eee9a42a4712d13aee34e2d793055d4125e98cc2c03451811f33168b3556d3bf52ee5ba8dda879cea808cdc!@dg.advantech.com>
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:00:53 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CVggufx2U0pZUXd1o=i36Jo-c1B=hgFcSaWeM+=oagaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL
 rate formula
To: "Ken.Lin" <ken.lin@advantech.com>
Cc: "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        "sboyd@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        "mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Peter.Stretz" <peter.stretz@advantech.com>,
        "Peter.Chiang" <peter.chiang@advantech.com>,
        Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@timesys.com>, Jason Moss <jason.moss@nxp.com>,
        "emil@limesaudio.com" <emil@limesaudio.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 455
Lines: 14

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@advantech.com> wrote:

> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
> I think the patches should fix the issue.

That's good news. Thanks for testing.

Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.

Emil,

Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.