Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754042AbcJKSnm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:43:42 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]:36686 "EHLO mail-vk0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328AbcJKSni (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 14:43:38 -0400 From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390AE@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP> <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A39613@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:34:52 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula To: Fabio Estevam Cc: "Ken.Lin" , Jason Moss , "Peter.Chiang" , "emil@limesaudio.com" , "mturquette@baylibre.com" , "sboyd@codeaurora.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Peter.Stretz" , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , Akshay Bhat , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 850 Lines: 23 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Ken, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin wrote: > >> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected. >> I think the patches should fix the issue. > > That's good news. Thanks for testing. > > Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series. > > Emil, > > Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3. And what will be done regarding 4.8? Is the faulty change to be reverted or this patches will be backported? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750