Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752963AbcJKTwJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:52:09 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18473 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752007AbcJKTwI (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:52:08 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,330,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="178844782" Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:48:59 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: g@intel.com, Peter Huewe , Marcel Selhorst , "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tpm_crb: map locality registers Message-ID: <20161011194859.GA11477@intel.com> References: <1476177787-15003-1-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <1476177787-15003-3-git-send-email-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20161011170143.GC6881@obsidianresearch.com> <20161011182100.GC6900@intel.com> <20161011182922.GB20253@obsidianresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161011182922.GB20253@obsidianresearch.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 25 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds > > > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right > > > > before the control area. > > > > > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in > > > changing all these lines twice > > > > > > But looks better to me. > > > > So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff? > > Just checking because this is 1/3 :) > > Hm, maybe my mailer went wrong, but I saw the original patch right > before this one.. Never mind I did format-patch -o to the same folder where I had the first series so I posted the RFC patches by accident. Sorry. Should always do --dry-run. > Jason /Jarkko