Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754171AbcJKVnq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:43:46 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61567 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754006AbcJKVno (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:43:44 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Hoan Tran Cc: Viresh Kumar , pprakash@codeaurora.org, Al Stone , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lho@apm.com, Duc Dang Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:50:27 +0200 Message-ID: <12733315.XoNTxDd2zv@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.8.0-rc2+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1476220320-19685-1-git-send-email-hotran@apm.com> References: <1476220320-19685-1-git-send-email-hotran@apm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1059 Lines: 30 On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 02:12:00 PM Hoan Tran wrote: > The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should > be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC. > The correct calculation is > desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz > > Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > index 1b2f28f..ab1d4b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; > > - cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = (u64)target_freq * policy->max / cppc_dmi_max_khz; > + cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = (u64)target_freq * cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz; > freqs.old = policy->cur; > freqs.new = target_freq; > > This patch has already been applied AFAICS. Thanks, Rafael