Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:06:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:06:58 -0500 Received: from griffon.mipsys.com ([217.167.51.129]:18114 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:06:57 -0500 Subject: Why moving driver includes ? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: James Simmons Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fbdev development list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1048857524.12125.2.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 28 Mar 2003 14:18:44 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 717 Lines: 22 Hi James ! Why did you move the driver includes to include/video ? What is the reasoning here ? For example, drivers/video/radeon.h moved to include/video/radeon.h Is this to be able to share register definitions with the DRM drivers ? (I doubt this will ever happen as the DRM is rather self contained) I would have preferred those includes to stay next to their respective drivers (though renaming radeon.h to radeonfb.h might have made some sense). Regards, Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/