Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932995AbcJLNAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:00:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:48616 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754833AbcJLMpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:45:14 -0400 From: lizf@kernel.org To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Karl Heiss , "David S. Miller" , Ben Hutchings , Zefan Li Subject: [PATCH 3.4 116/125] sctp: Prevent soft lockup when sctp_accept() is called during a timeout event Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:33:52 +0800 Message-Id: <1476275641-4697-116-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1476275600-4626-1-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> References: <1476275600-4626-1-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6784 Lines: 192 From: Karl Heiss 3.4.113-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ commit 635682a14427d241bab7bbdeebb48a7d7b91638e upstream. A case can occur when sctp_accept() is called by the user during a heartbeat timeout event after the 4-way handshake. Since sctp_assoc_migrate() changes both assoc->base.sk and assoc->ep, the bh_sock_lock in sctp_generate_heartbeat_event() will be taken with the listening socket but released with the new association socket. The result is a deadlock on any future attempts to take the listening socket lock. Note that this race can occur with other SCTP timeouts that take the bh_lock_sock() in the event sctp_accept() is called. BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 67s! [swapper:0] ... RIP: 0010:[] [] _spin_lock+0x1e/0x30 RSP: 0018:ffff880028323b20 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff880028323b20 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880028323be0 RDI: ffff8804632c4b48 RBP: ffffffff8100bb93 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff880610662280 R11: 0000000000000100 R12: ffff880028323aa0 R13: ffff8804383c3880 R14: ffff880028323a90 R15: ffffffff81534225 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880028320000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00000000006df528 CR3: 0000000001a85000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff880616b70000, task ffff880616b6cab0) Stack: ffff880028323c40 ffffffffa01c2582 ffff880614cfb020 0000000000000000 0100000000000000 00000014383a6c44 ffff8804383c3880 ffff880614e93c00 ffff880614e93c00 0000000000000000 ffff8804632c4b00 ffff8804383c38b8 Call Trace: [] ? sctp_rcv+0x492/0xa10 [sctp] [] ? nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0 [] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x2d0 [] ? nf_hook_slow+0x76/0x120 [] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x2d0 [] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0xdd/0x2d0 [] ? ip_local_deliver+0x98/0xa0 [] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x12d/0x440 [] ? ip_rcv+0x275/0x350 [] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x4ab/0x750 ... With lockdep debugging: ===================================== [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] ------------------------------------- CslRx/12087 is trying to release lock (slock-AF_INET) at: [] sctp_generate_timeout_event+0x40/0xe0 [sctp] but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by CslRx/12087: #0: (&asoc->timers[i]){+.-...}, at: [] run_timer_softirq+0x16f/0x3e0 #1: (slock-AF_INET){+.-...}, at: [] sctp_generate_timeout_event+0x23/0xe0 [sctp] Ensure the socket taken is also the same one that is released by saving a copy of the socket before entering the timeout event critical section. Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Net namespaces are not used - Keep using sctp_bh_{,un}lock_sock() - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Zefan Li --- net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c index 5fa033a..06c75b1 100644 --- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c @@ -249,11 +249,12 @@ void sctp_generate_t3_rtx_event(unsigned long peer) int error; struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) peer; struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc; + struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk; /* Check whether a task is in the sock. */ - sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk); - if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) { + sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk); + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__); /* Try again later. */ @@ -276,10 +277,10 @@ void sctp_generate_t3_rtx_event(unsigned long peer) transport, GFP_ATOMIC); if (error) - asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error; + sk->sk_err = -error; out_unlock: - sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk); + sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk); sctp_transport_put(transport); } @@ -289,10 +290,11 @@ out_unlock: static void sctp_generate_timeout_event(struct sctp_association *asoc, sctp_event_timeout_t timeout_type) { + struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk; int error = 0; - sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk); - if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) { + sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk); + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy: timer %d\n", __func__, timeout_type); @@ -316,10 +318,10 @@ static void sctp_generate_timeout_event(struct sctp_association *asoc, (void *)timeout_type, GFP_ATOMIC); if (error) - asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error; + sk->sk_err = -error; out_unlock: - sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk); + sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk); sctp_association_put(asoc); } @@ -369,9 +371,10 @@ void sctp_generate_heartbeat_event(unsigned long data) int error = 0; struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) data; struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc; + struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk; - sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk); - if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) { + sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk); + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__); /* Try again later. */ @@ -392,10 +395,10 @@ void sctp_generate_heartbeat_event(unsigned long data) transport, GFP_ATOMIC); if (error) - asoc->base.sk->sk_err = -error; + sk->sk_err = -error; out_unlock: - sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk); + sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk); sctp_transport_put(transport); } @@ -406,9 +409,10 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(unsigned long data) { struct sctp_transport *transport = (struct sctp_transport *) data; struct sctp_association *asoc = transport->asoc; + struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk; - sctp_bh_lock_sock(asoc->base.sk); - if (sock_owned_by_user(asoc->base.sk)) { + sctp_bh_lock_sock(sk); + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("%s:Sock is busy.\n", __func__); /* Try again later. */ @@ -429,7 +433,7 @@ void sctp_generate_proto_unreach_event(unsigned long data) asoc->state, asoc->ep, asoc, transport, GFP_ATOMIC); out_unlock: - sctp_bh_unlock_sock(asoc->base.sk); + sctp_bh_unlock_sock(sk); sctp_association_put(asoc); } -- 1.9.1