Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:13:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:13:21 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.254] ([81.2.110.254]:4093 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:13:20 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE 2.5.66-masked_irq-fix-A0 From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Suparna Bhattacharya , Andre Hedrick , Jens Axboe , LKML In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1048872307.5056.45.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 28 Mar 2003 17:25:08 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 20 On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 01:05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > logic is sound enough and I will fix it properly using the NO_IRQ > > stuff > > Something like that? > if (masked_irq != IDE_NO_IRQ && masked_irq != hwif->irq) I need to look at that further. Re-reading the code the non backed out logic seems right. Its causing problems but I'm now less convinced it is the guilty party. If the hwif irq is not masked mask it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/