Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932914AbcJLWTN (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:19:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:60138 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752159AbcJLWTD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:19:03 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 8C9B661690 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tbaicar@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 To: Russell King - ARM Linux References: <1475875882-2604-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <1475875882-2604-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <20161011185236.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Dkvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" , Richard Ruigrok , Naveen Kaje From: "Baicar, Tyler" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:18:58 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161011185236.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3291 Lines: 89 Hello Russell, Thank you for the feedback! Responses below On 10/11/2016 12:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:31:14PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote: >> +static void cper_estatus_print_section_v300(const char *pfx, >> + const struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata) >> +{ >> + __u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp; >> + >> + if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) { >> + timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp); >> + memcpy(&sec, timestamp, 1); >> + memcpy(&min, timestamp + 1, 1); >> + memcpy(&hour, timestamp + 2, 1); >> + memcpy(&day, timestamp + 4, 1); >> + memcpy(&mon, timestamp + 5, 1); >> + memcpy(&year, timestamp + 6, 1); >> + memcpy(¢ury, timestamp + 7, 1); > This is utterly silly. Why are you using memcpy() to access individual > bytes of a u8 pointer? What's wrong with: > > sec = timestamp[0]; > min = timestamp[1]; > hour = timestamp[2]; > day = timestamp[4]; > mon = timestamp[5]; > year = timestamp[6]; > century = timestamp[7]; > > or even do the conversion here: > > sec = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]); > ... etc ... Yes, that will be a lot cleaner especially with moving the conversion here. > >> + printk("%stime: ", pfx); >> + printk("%7s", 0x01 & *(timestamp + 3) ? "precise" : ""); >> + printk(" %02d:%02d:%02d %02d%02d-%02d-%02d\n", >> + bcd2bin(hour), bcd2bin(min), bcd2bin(sec), >> + bcd2bin(century), bcd2bin(year), bcd2bin(mon), >> + bcd2bin(day)); >> + } > It's also a good idea to (as much as possible) keep to single printk() > statements - which makes the emission of the string more atomic wrt > other CPUs and contexts. So, this should probably become (with the > conversion being done at the assignment of sec etc): > > printk("%stime: %7s %02d:%02d:%02d %02d%02d-%02d-%02d\n", > pfx, 0x01 & timestamp[3] ? "precise" : "", > hour, min, sec, century, year, mon, day); > > which, IMHO, looks a lot nicer and doesn't risk some other printk() > getting between each individual part of the line. I will make this change in the next version. This printk does look a lot nicer and avoids other prints from getting in the middle (I actually just saw that happen in testing a couple days ago) >> +} >> + >> static void cper_estatus_print_section( >> - const char *pfx, const struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no) >> + const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sec_no) >> { >> uuid_le *sec_type = (uuid_le *)gdata->section_type; >> __u16 severity; >> char newpfx[64]; >> >> + if ((gdata->revision >> 8) >= 0x03) >> + cper_estatus_print_section_v300(pfx, >> + (const struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *)gdata); >> + >> severity = gdata->error_severity; >> printk("%s""Error %d, type: %s\n", pfx, sec_no, >> cper_severity_str(severity)); > Not sure why you have the "" here - %sError works just as well and the > "" is just obfuscation - the compiler will eliminate the double-double > quote and merge the strings anyway. > I will remove the "" in the next version. Thanks, Tyler -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.