Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932557AbcJMOOL (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:14:11 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:51117 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239AbcJMOOK (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:14:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1476366354.4904.31.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [mac80211] BUG_ON with current -git (4.8.0-11417-g24532f7) From: Johannes Berg To: Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "David S. Miller" , Linux Wireless List , Network Development , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sergey Senozhatsky , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Rothwell , Herbert Xu Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:45:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161013134252.GA583@swordfish> (sfid-20161013_154350_352486_97A4AB85) References: <20161010150358.GA514@swordfish> <20161010153050.GA836@swordfish> <1476263106.5271.23.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20161012141245.GA436@swordfish> <1476282127.5271.30.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1476338524.4904.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20161013134252.GA583@swordfish> (sfid-20161013_154350_352486_97A4AB85) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1120 Lines: 34 On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 22:42 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >  > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commi > > > t/?h=x86/vmap_stack&id=0a39cfa6fbb5d5635c85253cc7d6b44b54822afd > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commi > > > t/?h=x86/vmap_stack&id=bf8cfa200b5a01383ea39fc8ce2f32909767baa8 > > > > That truly sounds like something we'd rather avoid in the TX/RX > > paths though, which should perform well. > > didn't fix. It couldn't, since the new helpers weren't used in mac80211 in those patches yet. > so I finally had some time to do a better bug-reporter job. > > I added a bunch of printk-s and several virt_addr_valid()-s > to ieee80211_aes_ccm_encrypt(). > > and right befoe the Oops I see the following report from > virt_addr_valid() > > >  FAIL: 00004100002cba02 > ffffc900802cba02 || 1 -> (00004100002cba02 > >> 39) == 130 Yeah, we already know that in this function the aad variable is on the stack, it explicitly is. The question, though, is why precisely that fails in the crypto code. Can you send the Oops report itself? johannes