Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:18:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:18:27 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:21966 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:18:26 -0500 Subject: Re: 3c59x gives HWaddr FF:FF:... From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML In-Reply-To: <20030328230510.GA5124@werewolf.able.es> References: <20030328145159.GA4265@werewolf.able.es> <20030328124832.44243f83.akpm@digeo.com> <20030328230510.GA5124@werewolf.able.es> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048897765.601.5.camel@teapot> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 29 Mar 2003 01:29:26 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1990 Lines: 46 On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 00:05, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > > What happens ? Any solution available ? > > > > The eeprom wasn't powered up. > > > > Please take the 2.4.20 3c59x.c and place that into the 2.5 tree and confirm > > that it does the same thing (it will).> > > Hum, I suppose you want to say take the _2.5_ one and put into my _2.4_ tree ? > Some previous answer also talked about a more recent version in -ac. > (btw, can 2.5 be useful for something ? does not the driver depend on a new > arch of, for example, the PCI layer ? ) > > > Then try disabling APCI and/or otherwise fiddling with your power management > > options (maybe in BIOS too).> > > I don't build ACPI, just APM power-off (SMP box). > Will take a look at 2.4-ac (it looks like the most similar thing to what I have) > and to 2.5. I had exactly the same issue as you, but this time it was on my laptop when using a 3CCFE575CT CardBus 10/100 NIC. The only solution I found was to use SourceForge's PCMCIA-CS instead of the built-in PCMCIA support. I tracked down the problem to PCI resource allocation, although never knew what was causing it: the CardBus bridge was using the PCI subsystem to allocate resources for my CardBus NIC, but it failed and tried to assign an invalid I/O range (the starting I/O address was higher than the ending I/O address). I wasn't able to fix it, but in newer kernel releases, the problem was fixed. Now, I've got other problems: the card works correctly and I get full throughput when sending data using FTP/NFS/SCP (~12MBps) but no more than 4MBps when receiving files. ________________________________________________________________________ Felipe Alfaro Solana Linux Registered User #287198 http://counter.li.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/