Message-ID: <1476382005.1999.29.camel@tiscali.nl>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] drm/i915: WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk <
 crtc_clock)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:06:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1476270522.2817.12.camel@linux.intel.com>
References: <1476266167.7439.8.camel@tiscali.nl>
         <1476270522.2817.12.camel@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1023
Lines: 29

[Adding Matt]

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 14:08 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Bisecting the offending commit between v4.8 and v4.8.1 would be a good
> start.

0) Why use a personal notebook when one can just post any half baked
idea to lkml?

1) I stumbled on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361357 (s
ame hardware, rather similar trace).

2) That report was about the first Fedora (rawhide) kernel release
after this commit http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/kernel.git/co
mmit/?h=f25&id=7d2c2f2d91793b5da452bee9bea4fa32051c8608 ("Bring in
patch-series from drm-next to fix skl_update_other_pipe_wm issues").

3) That seventeen part series ended up in v4.8. The last commit of that
series is commit 5b483747a925 ("drm/i915: Remove wm_config from
dev_priv/intel_atomic_state").

4) So, with a little bit of luck, my bisect might only need to look at
those seventeen commits. Still, it will probably be next week before I
have a day or two to actually perform that bisect.

To be continued,


Paul Bolle