Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754886AbcJNMCO (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:02:14 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:52075 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754768AbcJNMB7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:01:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [media] RedRat3: Move two assignments in redrat3_transmit_ir()? To: Dan Carpenter References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <81cef537-4ad0-3a74-8bde-94707dcd03f4@users.sourceforge.net> <20161014081524.GF5687@mwanda> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sean Young , Wolfram Sang , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:01:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161014081524.GF5687@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ChhBNEHPfW4v1oDjaeiU2ZDeR0K+WWtfqZzQvsY31uHjLtNa/as abuM315Zq5emjhba7cC8HZEXTj6qcmJsXvNGygHt3TnnBTl9DYifaJfxHfK0iBVcZEdW2ht ZxMAEe+0o2krj+xzApNjngn0yrgmAu2u2/nd7oA8+qfEb4GqNK5SxVzCUyADr0RSKuHddzS re2rMmgocTd2QR4RDnJMw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:F+71LChxvaI=:+9yLo0j+FEXi/t9vs3wexB LWN73AvmNKEj2JPAXyDZgDyqietS6H2CcSXZ6l64h3S+2N0/JAhvaTPxtNx4oZTpr/s0bkOJB 53DHFjDAl++kR7xdHEo2jldsNjoZIyYe7Xn/9/2Y+KZrKmqb9uSS8QBn48DiDPCnXt/hHrHOu BRvzQexrH/tPSryaa1g7gTyOKHqA63jSP1MoVmWSH8EOSr2TFq0kebs1HC7AIxGw9RA8AkG6e IHNJdJZTsWQPxpIBJbjvO6mFHizYfpUJC2G7Aig188V5TjXjziqG9ZRIoMJQQKQEsPD4LpnhA +oNnFnTDv9cZO9MoVPW8p8WcuPrLqViNYJmLwH4MMscsIYOkUxAmKgan2pBfpM9k7NZleJ7ma IlXxIkmhkEdAfk89hobOBGm4hSSuCoAblvbbpeVHQlTGYLF+YyHJ9x4eTlRxOgXK5nJRSdcO4 fYHTvTKgb9kNA6eUyOo51TIXgII2+/hK2ftbOEkS6y1PIZDTlM5mDfYQiozqMbzGWoZuNJ6oI DhtzE7PXSzEKKH46P5RGQv4Cmy5AFsmBbhN5z5uZvcJhDZUQR7aLwa78eqt/lGqEzz4vs7PUV RgMJhXU8f3eavo1pPPDfQHUOxaPPZIj9OtWkE2r/hp/wiBLkKTXs+xDF9hnX/+TZjSbROjXNf ZozrmMc7ndNhS0I3eo2PbtgROSWf9D+6tJ4mE5wsmq6wzL0gtzabFZT8ncSR5Sv9f7YaBir3P qslof700E1LA9UVwF4kiO4oEyJYtSKsqdHFhSabCZgSKlqT1005Qqe4A4OjWOkl7GU6kOrIee fi2U3j0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 306 Lines: 10 > The original code was correct. Your view can be appropriate for this function implementation to some degree. I got the impression that it contains the specification of assignments which will happen a bit too early here. Is this a weakness for which software developers can care about? Regards, Markus