Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:30:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:30:33 -0500 Received: from tomts26-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.189]:10400 "EHLO tomts26-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:30:32 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:36:53 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@dell To: john@grabjohn.com cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Scharfe , , Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] Cleanup in fs/devpts/inode.c In-Reply-To: <200303291829.h2TITPPi000418@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 927 Lines: 32 On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 john@grabjohn.com wrote: > > this patch un-complicates a small piece of code of the dev/pts > > filesystem and decreases the size of the object code by 8 bytes > > for my build. Yay! :) > > > - err = PTR_ERR(devpts_mnt); > > - if (!IS_ERR(devpts_mnt)) > > - err = 0; > > + if (IS_ERR(devpts_mnt)) > > + err = PTR_ERR(devpts_mnt); > > Why not use > > err = (IS_ERR(devpts_mnt) ? err = 0 : PTR_ERR(devpts_mnt)); without my handy-dandy C reference book here, don't you have that backwards? and is there some value to using "err = 0" internally rather than just "0"? rday p.s. risking major embarrassment if i didn't remember my C programming ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/