Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754822AbcJNQ3P (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:29:15 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39884 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929AbcJNQ3G (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:29:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 To: "Baicar, Tyler" , christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Dkvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org References: <1475875882-2604-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <1475875882-2604-3-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <3f17d0a8-6b63-5792-903a-341effaae432@arm.com> <064dca7d-0625-c0d0-09ae-72ef7abdc63f@arm.com> <912acc88-fbaf-2576-8048-1fcc67439600@codeaurora.org> Cc: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" , Richard Ruigrok , Naveen Kaje From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: <38c7c9ac-e8ad-6fb5-3ee9-3ba85e4b8299@arm.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:28:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <912acc88-fbaf-2576-8048-1fcc67439600@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1340 Lines: 28 On 13/10/16 20:37, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > Hello Suzuki, > > On 10/13/2016 2:50 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 12/10/16 23:10, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >>>> Please could you keep the people who reviewed/commented on your series in the past, >>>> whenever you post a new version ? >>> Do you mean to just send the new version to their e-mail directly in addition to the lists? If so, I will do that next time. >> >> If you send a new version of a series to the list, it is a good idea to keep >> the people who commented (significantly) on your previous version in Cc, especially >> when you have addressed their feedback. That will help them to keep track of the >> series. People can always see the new version in the list, but then it is so easy >> to miss something in the 100s of emails you get each day. I am sure people have >> special filters for the emails based on if they are in Cc/To etc. >> > Okay, understood. I'll make sure to add those who have commented in the cc/to list to avoid the e-mail filters. Thanks ! >> Is it always the same endianness as that of the CPU ? > It is a fair assumption that the firmware populating this record will use a CPU of the same endianness. There is no mechanism in the spec to indicate otherwise. Yep, you are right. The EFI expects the EL2/EL1 to be of the same endianness Cheers Suzuki