Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:09:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:09:55 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:50618 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:09:54 -0500 Subject: Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c) From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Robert Love Cc: Peter Lundkvist , akpm@digeo.com, mingo@elte.hu, LKML In-Reply-To: <1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost> References: <3E8610EA.8080309@telia.com> <1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048987260.679.7.camel@teapot> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:21:01 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 953 Lines: 27 On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 00:23, Robert Love wrote: > This seems to confirm it was one of the interactivity changes that went > into 2.5.65. I figured as much but it is nice to get confirmation. > Thank you for trying this. > > Now to figure out which one... > > > My system is a P-III 700 (Inspiron 4000), > > and Debian (X is running at nice = -10). > > I wonder if the reniced X is a factor? Theoretically, with interactivity enhancaments, you'll never need to renice X. In fact, I'm running X with no renice and it feels pretty snappy. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Felipe Alfaro Solana > Linux Registered User #287198 > http://counter.li.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/