Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756207AbcJPO7q (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 16 Oct 2016 10:59:46 -0400
Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:45993 "EHLO
        out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753952AbcJPO7j (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 16 Oct 2016 10:59:39 -0400
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Iago Lopez Galeiras <iago@kinvolk.io>,
        Aaron Campbell <aaron@monkey.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
        Jesper Derehag <jderehag@hotmail.com>, Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
        Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.ledkov@intel.com>
References: <1476534370-4027-1-git-send-email-alban@kinvolk.io>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:57:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1476534370-4027-1-git-send-email-alban@kinvolk.io> (Alban
        Crequy's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:26:08 +0200")
Message-ID: <87twcctk83.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-XM-SPF: eid=1bvmuW-00064P-J6;;;mid=<87twcctk83.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=75.170.125.99;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX180E6CL2di8f6mDAh0t7hQ3Mjd4GNP3cjI=
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 75.170.125.99
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
        *  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
        *  0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available.
        *  0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.4984]
        * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC
        *      [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1]
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 
X-Spam-Combo: ;Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: 
X-Spam-Timing: total 575 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%),
        signal_user_changed: 6 (1.0%), b_tie_ro: 4.3 (0.7%), parse: 1.18 (0.2%),
        extract_message_metadata: 3.2 (0.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.87 (0.2%),
        tests_pri_-1000: 4.4 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.14 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900:
        0.86 (0.1%), tests_pri_-400: 19 (3.4%), check_bayes: 18 (3.1%), b_tokenize:
        3.9 (0.7%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.26 (0.2%),
        b_tok_touch_all: 3.6 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.90 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 526 (91.4%),
        check_dkim_signature: 0.40 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.1 (0.5%),
        tests_pri_500: 3.3 (0.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%)
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] proc connector: get namespace events
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 596
Lines: 18

Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@gmail.com> writes:

> This is v2 of the patch set to add namespace events in the proc
> connector.

So while not totally wrong the way you report namespaces makes me
grumpy.  You are not including the device node of the filesystem
those inodes are on.  The inode number is meaningless if you don't
specify which filesystem the inode is from. 

I absolutely do not want to have to implement a namespace for namespaces
someday just because people have been sloppy like this.

So please correct this to at least report the full information on
namespaces.

Thank you,
Eric