Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932921AbcJPQMQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:12:16 -0400 Received: from mx-guillaumet.finsecur.com ([91.217.234.131]:40571 "EHLO guillaumet.finsecur.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932822AbcJPQL4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:11:56 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2298 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:11:55 EDT Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:33:16 +0200 From: Sylvain Rochet To: Guenter Roeck , Alexandre Belloni , Boris BREZILLON , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20161016153316.rsrcgnki6kn7gola@finsecur.com> References: <1444163325-3041-1-git-send-email-sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com> <20151007110112.GD3485@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151007110112.GD3485@piout.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.16.8.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on guillaumet.finsecur.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1117 Lines: 28 Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: > > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with > > at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog > > times out while the CPU is in idle state. Removing the > > AT91_WDT_WDIDLEHLT flag that was set by default fixes this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rochet > > Fixes: 5161b31dc39a ("watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support") > > Cc: # 3.14+ > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > However, we don't really care about that for kernels after 3.18 as no > users are using pdata anymore. > I think you could send a follow-up patch removing pdata support > completely. Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline and therefore wasn't applied to stable branches. I just checked, it still apply properly on today's linux-next branch. Cheers, Sylvain