Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755323AbcJPQOE (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:14:04 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47565 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbcJPQNy (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:13:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:14:00 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Vegard Nossum Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , Linus Torvalds , "Luis R . Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers Message-ID: <20161016161400.GA19899@kroah.com> References: <20161016151616.31451-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161016151616.31451-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 18 On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 05:16:04PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: > Hi, > > The first two patches in the series fix the concrete bug (a boot crash > when using gcc 7.0+) by defining new wrappers for arrays defined in > linker scripts. These two patches should probably go into the kernel + > stable as soon as people are happy with the new interface. Not sure who > would pick this up, Greg maybe? Ugh, that's messy, but nice fixup. I can take these in my tree. I'd like to get others to review them first, but I can queue them up in a week or so if there is no objections. Is gcc 7.0 "stable" enough that people will start to be using it soon? thanks, greg k-h