Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 05:05:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 05:05:47 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:21894 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 05:05:46 -0500 Subject: Re: Bad interactive behaviour in 2.5.65-66 (sched.c) From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Robert Love Cc: Peter Lundkvist , akpm@digeo.com, mingo@elte.hu, LKML In-Reply-To: <1048989922.13757.20.camel@localhost> References: <3E8610EA.8080309@telia.com> <1048980204.13757.17.camel@localhost> <1048987260.679.7.camel@teapot> <1048989922.13757.20.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049019383.597.0.camel@teapot> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 30 Mar 2003 12:16:23 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 20 On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 04:05, Robert Love wrote: > I was wondering, since we are working on an actual bug here, whether or > not renicing X is leading to a starvation issue between X and whatever > is starving. I have seen it before. > > My system is responsive, too, and I do not renice X. But it might > help. Or it might cause starvation issues. We have a bug somewhere... I'm gonna try renicing X to see how it behaves... ________________________________________________________________________ Felipe Alfaro Solana Linux Registered User #287198 http://counter.li.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/