Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757345AbcJPQaG (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:30:06 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:32881 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753193AbcJPQ3w (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:29:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:35:57 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: hpa@zytor.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, piotr.luc@intel.com, luto@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpufeature: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS features Message-ID: <20161016163557.weyfwd4obnk3rh5v@pd.tnic> References: <20161012175731.29619-1-piotr.luc@intel.com> <20161016142233.xuqrahty6gcwq7en@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 469 Lines: 17 On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:02:51AM -0700, hpa@zytor.com wrote: > No, please. That would be worse than the disease. Why not? I did that recently with a bunch of leaves and there were no issues: 2ccd71f1b278 ("x86/cpufeature: Move some of the scattered feature bits to x86_capability") There it obviously made sense for 0x00000006 and 0x8000000a to have a separate ->x86_capability leaf. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.