Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756775AbcJPUjg (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:39:36 -0400 Received: from mx-guillaumet.finsecur.com ([91.217.234.131]:45390 "EHLO guillaumet.finsecur.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754399AbcJPUj3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:39:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:39:21 +0200 From: Sylvain Rochet To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Boris BREZILLON , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" , "wim@iguana.be" Message-ID: <20161016203921.aq2iffthlowncisa@finsecur.com> References: <1444163325-3041-1-git-send-email-sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com> <20151007110112.GD3485@piout.net> <20161016153316.rsrcgnki6kn7gola@finsecur.com> <67fe262e-31e4-b9dc-da71-af601079bfec@roeck-us.net> <59c665f8-de09-c11c-f62a-5064016cd8fd@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59c665f8-de09-c11c-f62a-5064016cd8fd@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.16.8.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on guillaumet.finsecur.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 23 Hi Guenter, On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:55:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: > > > > > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline > > > and therefore wasn't applied to stable branches. > > > > Possibly that happened because you did not copy the watchdog mailing list. > > ... and your other patches were not sent to the watchdog mailing list either, > so you should not expect them to be picked up either. > > Seriously, how do you expect _any_ patch to be picked up if you neither copy > the subsystem mailing list nor the subsystem maintainer ? Whoops, thanks for the heads up, I wonder how I managed to mess up that at that time, I usually take care of that. The other series need respinning anyway so I can fix it for v2 (if any). Cheers, Sylvain