Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965017AbcJQOCC (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:02:02 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45757 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932978AbcJQOBv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:01:51 -0400 Subject: Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions? To: SF Markus Elfring , Bernd Petrovitsch , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <92c52f1d-d151-cea6-e9ac-31378e6862d0@users.sourceforge.net> <1475771699.1914.10.camel@perches.com> <77fb6fdc-7480-8607-0af1-42f73c125b9d@users.sourceforge.net> <688764a4-072d-2faf-37ba-a222b190a5d9@suse.de> <59d71170-c48d-a084-c748-b6ab74a2bee4@users.sourceforge.net> <1e151094-e228-5307-ae2f-b376b31f5628@suse.de> <83e720c6-9037-a3c1-6e83-27505805f37f@users.sourceforge.net> <2cc42b2f-1f1a-e95c-91fa-54e1dd3b6d49@suse.de> <653e60ee-f862-8828-3e4f-498c7cc34bdc@users.sourceforge.net> <1476703920.2520.105.camel@petrovitsch.priv.at> <97f31b70-e3ff-f194-c753-54da1fe3e664@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Joe Perches , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, ltp@lists.linux.it From: Hannes Reinecke Message-ID: <57299b72-8e6b-0b92-4374-1b7a0907e810@suse.de> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:01:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <97f31b70-e3ff-f194-c753-54da1fe3e664@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1017 Lines: 27 On 10/17/2016 01:43 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> See above. At the moment _any_ test result from your side would do. >>> >>> I imagine that another single result might not be representative. >> >> Publish not only results but also everything (complete!) so that anyone >> can *easily* follow it to check and reproduce the results - especially >> if you want people with knowledge of other architectures to comment >> (otherwise they probably won't bother). > > Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider > implementation details from three status functions? > No. But we're waiting for you showing is that it is an improvement. Which at the moment we don't see. Hence we're waiting from a proof or validation from your side. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: F. Imend?rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)