Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:40:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:40:26 -0500 Received: from paja.kn.vutbr.cz ([147.229.191.135]:52753 "EHLO paja.kn.vutbr.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:40:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3E8774FA.7070209@kn.vutbr.cz> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:51:38 +0200 From: Michal Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: cs, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Galbraith CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reproducible terrible interactivity since 2.5.64bk2 References: <1048687681.6345.13.camel@spinel.tao.co.uk> <3E81945C.4010102@kn.vutbr.cz> <1048687681.6345.13.camel@spinel.tao.co.uk> <5.2.0.9.2.20030328181731.01997810@pop.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030328181731.01997810@pop.gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.73.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1413 Lines: 35 Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Greetings potential victims :) > > Care to see if the attached cures your woes? > > This is a mixture of Ingo's last posted plus the scheduler tuning knobs > patch (/proc/sys/sched/*). I added three new knobs to watch the effect > on different loads. max_accel_slices limits the amount of sleep_time > you may add in one activation. retard_prct_slices is a percentage of a > slice to deduct from sleep_time each activation (negative feedback for > heavy context switchers.. dang irman process_load). force_switch is > there because I'm playing :) I didn't do much to the scheduler itself, > only made it switch arrays in something closer to a square wave. With > the settings as in the patch, and running a kernel build, top and irman, > irman reports worst case response times of 150ms for NULL load, 316ms > for memory_load, 414 for io_load, and 504ms for process_load. > > Anyway, it's attached if you want to play with it ;-) > > -Mike > > Oh, it's against virgin 2.5.66. Thanks, running 2.5.66 with the patch applied I could no more reproduce the problem. I haven't tried playing with the knobs. Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/