Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935633AbcJQQja (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:39:30 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:38748 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753126AbcJQQj0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:39:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems To: Juri Lelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <66c7bbfd-ec3f-ff43-9a06-ae644d9ee9d9@arm.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:39:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1213 Lines: 32 On 17/10/16 16:46, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a repost of version 7 of "CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous > systems" patchset [1] (please refer to previous postings to get some context). > I only added Juno r1 dts, as discussed off-line with Sudeep meanwhile (no code > changes at all, so that's why I'm saying this is a repost). > > I'm reposting as I didn't receive any comment (despite pinging people) on the > original v7 posting (apart from Vincent acking patches 2 and 4, thanks!). I > then waited until merge window for 4.9 was closed. > > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > Otherwise I'm going to: > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 I have applied 3 to [1] and 5,6,7 to [2]. Let me know if things change and you want me to drop them with some cosmetic subject change and updated changelog. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/linux/h/vexpress-dt/for-next [2] git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/linux/h/juno-dt/for-next