Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1030312AbcJQVJY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:09:24 -0400
Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:45627 "EHLO pokefinder.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1030209AbcJQVJQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:09:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:09:10 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com>
Cc: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mark device nodes only in case of successful
 instantiation
Message-ID: <20161017210909.GB1681@katana>
References: <20161014193113.29275-1-ralf@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
 <CAMuHMdUMvjZvwBMUrWTk+obbUYsfRJxPTmdnv7Fz6uzkQ8nbbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <39e8d53a-a93d-feeb-044f-9b1b239dff21@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
 <33118B65-9BF4-45AF-AC55-B44BECB5BBD1@gmail.com>
 <20161017210752.GA1681@katana>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161017210752.GA1681@katana>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1258
Lines: 37


--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> > Thanks for this. This is a very rare case that=E2=80=99s easy to slip t=
hrough.
> > It is good to be consistent :)
>=20
> I read this as acked-by for the series?

Ah, I mixed up. You acked V2 :)


--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=0crC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ--