Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:32:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:32:49 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.254] ([81.2.110.254]:11256 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:32:48 -0500 Subject: Re: hdparm and removable IDE? From: Alan Cox To: John Bradford Cc: house@uqd.edu.au, Andre Hedrick , davidsen@tmr.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200303311121.h2VBL63v020452@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <200303311121.h2VBL63v020452@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049111033.16120.10.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 31 Mar 2003 12:43:54 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 833 Lines: 21 On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:21, John Bradford wrote: > > > Something that occurs to me - if a machine has non hot-swap capable > > > IDE hardware, but has suspend to RAM functionality, presumably it is > > > OK from an electronic viewpoint to swap disks? What about PCI hot > > > swap? Presumably we can remove a non hot-swap IDE controller > > > completely, and re-install it with different drives connected? > > > > It is but Linux doesn't support it > > Not yet :-) > > Seriously, I thought both were under active development - is this a > 2.7, or 2.9 timescale thing? Probably yes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/