Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759734AbcJRKfw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:35:52 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:59231 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810AbcJRKfn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:35:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,361,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="774007166" From: Jani Nikula To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Create an User's manual and improve development-process book In-Reply-To: <20161018082018.17e09799@vento.lan> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20161017164342.28d4f0c3@lwn.net> <87shruvuw2.fsf@intel.com> <20161018082018.17e09799@vento.lan> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:35:39 +0300 Message-ID: <87pomyvtac.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1508 Lines: 46 On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:01:01 +0300 > Jani Nikula escreveu: > >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> > So I raised this topic in talks at both Kernel Recipes and LinuxCon >> > Europe, and nobody threw things at me. I have come to suspect that I'm >> > worrying a little too much about it; maybe we should go ahead and move >> > the documents and see who screams. >> >> While at it, how about unifying some of the FilenamesInCamelCase, >> filenames-with-hyphens, and filenames_with_underscores too...? To at >> least move things towards just one of them within one directory. > > Sure, let's do it. I would just keep README as README.rst , as people > are more used to see readme files on upercases. Right, I guess I'd keep the top level files as-is, and just do this within Documentation. > For the rest, what's your preference? > > - FooBar.rst > - foo_bar.rst > - foo-bar.rst > > My personal preference is for "foo-bar". Same here, but I don't mind so much *which* one it is as long as at least each directory has consistent naming. > Thanks! Life would be very boring if everybody would have the same > opinion :) So, feel free to disagree with me. Your views are very > welcome, even when differs from my own :) Thanks, good to check we're on the same page here and not antagonizing. :) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center