Message-ID: <1476903175.28989.4.camel@tiscali.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/2] 4.4.26-stable review
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:52:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20161019182806.226441558@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20161019182806.226441558@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 559
Lines: 15

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 20:30 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.26 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Did I botch my attempt at a backport of "lightnvm: ensure that
nvm_dev_ops can be used without CONFIG_NVM" to v4.4.y (see
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1476477349-28155-1-git-send-email-pebolle@ti
scali.nl> ) sufficiently for it to be dropped?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle