Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:34:02 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/2] 4.4.26-stable review
Message-ID: <20161019193402.GA21125@kroah.com>
References: <20161019182806.226441558@linuxfoundation.org>
 <1476903175.28989.4.camel@tiscali.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1476903175.28989.4.camel@tiscali.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 923
Lines: 21

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:52:55PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 20:30 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.26 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.??If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Did I botch my attempt at a backport of "lightnvm: ensure that
> nvm_dev_ops can be used without CONFIG_NVM" to v4.4.y (see
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1476477349-28155-1-git-send-email-pebolle@ti
> scali.nl>?) sufficiently for it to be dropped?

It's in good company, sitting along with 250+ other patches I have yet
to work through to apply to the stable kernels.  For various reasons I
needed to get a round of stable kernels out sooner, which is why it
isn't in there.  Don't worry, it's not lost, it will get handled
eventually...

thanks,

greg k-h