Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761476AbcJSUPt (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:15:49 -0400 Received: from smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.123]:23641 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757030AbcJSUPs (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:15:48 -0400 X-ME-Helo: belgarion X-ME-Auth: amFyem1pay5yb2JlcnRAb3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:15:46 +0200 X-ME-IP: 109.220.223.51 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Michael Turquette , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq References: <1476130149-31834-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <1476130149-31834-6-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <87zim23zw3.fsf@belgarion.home> <20161018234855.GO8871@codeaurora.org> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:15:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161018234855.GO8871@codeaurora.org> (Stephen Boyd's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:48:55 -0700") Message-ID: <877f943xjk.fsf@belgarion.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1311 Lines: 36 Stephen Boyd writes: > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Robert Jarzmik writes: >> Hi Michael and Stephen, >> >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. >> >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or >> should I delay the v2 posting ? >> > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > What's blocking that? OPP tables? Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with platform_data" or something else. >From what I've seen so far, the missing/blocking points are : - the OPP points definition as you said - probably same thing for the input power supply / regulator - the cooling parts probably - and more generaly all the cpufreq-dt is built around device-tree - last point, the name from KConfig, "Generic DT based cpufreq driver" => that strongly suggest it's device-tree only I'm deeply convinced that Viresh being one of the authors will shed more light on this. Cheers. -- Robert