Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932910AbcJTDpU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:45:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:34004 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932543AbcJTDpC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:45:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:14:58 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Robert Jarzmik , Michael Turquette , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: pxa: transfer CPU clock setting from pxa2xx-cpufreq Message-ID: <20161020034458.GE11766@vireshk-i7> References: <1476130149-31834-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <1476130149-31834-6-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <87zim23zw3.fsf@belgarion.home> <20161018234855.GO8871@codeaurora.org> <877f943xjk.fsf@belgarion.home> <20161019205128.GE8871@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161019205128.GE8871@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1290 Lines: 33 On 19-10-16, 13:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/19, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Stephen Boyd writes: > > > > > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > >> Robert Jarzmik writes: > > >> Hi Michael and Stephen, > > >> > > >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the data > > >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were wrong. > > >> > > >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week or > > >> should I delay the v2 posting ? > > >> > > > > > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > > > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > > > What's blocking that? OPP tables? > > > > Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. > > To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with > > platform_data" or something else. > > I mean platform_data mostly. Do you use ACPI with the clk driver? I would like to see sample code for that, as I am not sure what all changes would be required in cpufreq-dt in that case. Yes it is more dependent on the OPP framework than DT right now. My first impression is that it should be doable.. -- viresh