MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610201117380.5073@nanos>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1610191311010.24555@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1610191329500.29288@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
 <CAJwJo6Z8ZWPqNfT6t-i8GW1MKxQrKDUagQqnZ+0+697=MyVeGg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610201117380.5073@nanos>
From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:00:51 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJwJo6YAgYqtdrPH+Gk5jEse_hSLme8_YwSp7U-CdEWfMZe5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: x32 is broken in 4.9-rc1 due to "x86/signal: Add
 SA_{X32,IA32}_ABI sa_flags"
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 628
Lines: 18

2016-10-20 12:24 GMT+03:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>> could you give attached patch a shot?
>
> Can you please stop sending attached patches? It's a pain to look at them
> and it makes it hard to reply inline.

Sure, I've planned to resend it after get tested-by or when I test
on x32 by myself. Sorry about attaching and changelog.

> I applied it and rewrote the changelog because the one liner you slapped
> into it is more than useless. Ditto for the completely misleading subject
> line. Please be more careful with that.

Thanks, Thomas!

-- 
             Dmitry