Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932926AbcJTPpl (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:45:41 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:47351 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933512AbcJTPpf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:45:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock To: Stephen Boyd References: <1476436699-21879-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1476436699-21879-6-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20161019203228.GC8871@codeaurora.org> CC: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Michael Turquette , Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann , , , , , , , , From: Gabriel Fernandez Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:44:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161019203228.GC8871@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.48.1.80] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-10-20_08:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1920 Lines: 67 Hi Stephen On 10/19/2016 10:32 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote: >> @@ -532,10 +618,42 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name, >> { 0 }, >> }; >> >> +struct stm32f4_clk_data { >> + const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data; >> + const u64 *gates_map; >> + int gates_num; >> +}; >> @@ -549,6 +667,19 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np) >> goto fail; >> } >> >> + match = of_match_node(stm32f4_of_match, np); >> + if (WARN_ON(!match)) >> + return; >> + >> + data = match->data; >> + >> + clks = kmalloc_array(data->gates_num + END_PRIMARY_CLK, >> + sizeof(struct clk_hw *), GFP_KERNEL); > sizeof(*clks)? ok > >> + if (!clks) >> + goto fail; >> + >> + stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map; >> + >> hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0); >> >> clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0, >> @@ -581,11 +712,15 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np) >> clks[FCLK] = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "fclk", "ahb_div", >> 0, 1, 1); >> >> - for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4_gates); n++) { >> - const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd = &stm32f4_gates[n]; >> - unsigned int secondary = >> - 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + gd->bit_idx; >> - int idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary); >> + for (n = 0; n < data->gates_num; n++) { >> + const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd; >> + unsigned int secondary; >> + int idx; >> + >> + gd = (struct stm32f4_gate_data *) &data->gates_data[n]; > Why do we cast here? Get rid of const? Perhaps the struct > shouldn't have const on the member instead? we don't need cast here. Thank's Stephen BR Gabriel > >> + secondary = 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + >> + gd->bit_idx; >> + idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary); >> >> if (idx < 0)